Перевод: с английского на все языки

со всех языков на английский

object perception

  • 1 object perception

    Автоматика: восприятие объекта (напр. сенсорами робота)

    Универсальный англо-русский словарь > object perception

  • 2 object perception

    восприятие объекта (напр. сенсорами робота)

    English-Russian dictionary of mechanical engineering and automation > object perception

  • 3 object perception

    Англо-русский словарь по психоаналитике > object perception

  • 4 object perception

    восприятие объекта (напр. сенсорами установки)

    Англо-русский словарь по машиностроению > object perception

  • 5 perception

    English-Russian dictionary of mechanical engineering and automation > perception

  • 6 object

    Англо-русский словарь по машиностроению > object

  • 7 object colour perception

    object colour perception Farbeindruck m einer Körperfarbe

    English-German dictionary of Electrical Engineering and Electronics > object colour perception

  • 8 perception of an object appearing larger than it is

    perception of an object appearing larger than it is, macropsia
    увеличение восприятия предмета, макропсия

    English-Russian dictionary of medicine > perception of an object appearing larger than it is

  • 9 perception of an object appearing smaller than it is

    perception of an object appearing smaller than it is, micropsia
    уменьшение восприятия предметов, микроскопия

    English-Russian dictionary of medicine > perception of an object appearing smaller than it is

  • 10 perception

    noun
    1) (act) Wahrnehmung, die; (result) Erkenntnis, die

    have keen perceptionsein stark ausgeprägtes Wahrnehmungsvermögen haben

    2) no pl. (faculty) Wahrnehmungsvermögen, das
    3) (intuitive recognition) Gespür, das (of für); (instance) Erfassen, das
    * * *
    [pə'sepʃən]
    (the ability to see, understand etc clearly: a man of great perception.) das Wahrnehmungsvermögen
    - academic.ru/54533/perceptive">perceptive
    - perceptively
    - perceptiveness
    * * *
    per·cep·tion
    [pəˈsepʃən, AM pɚ-]
    n usu sing Wahrnehmung f kein pl; of a conception Auffassung f kein pl
    powers of \perception Wahrnehmungsvermögen nt
    \perception of reality Wahrnehmung f der Wirklichkeit
    \perception of time Zeitempfinden nt
    * * *
    [pə'sepSən]
    n
    1) no pl Wahrnehmung f

    his colour perception is impairedseine Farbwahrnehmung ist beeinträchtigt

    2) (= mental image, conception) Auffassung f (of von)

    he seems to have a clear perception of the dilemma I faceer scheint meine schwierige Lage vollauf zu erkennen

    one's perception of the situationdie eigene Einschätzung der Lage

    3) no pl (= perceptiveness) Einsicht f; (= perceptive remark, observation) Beobachtung f
    4) no pl (= act of perceiving) (of object, visible difference) Wahrnehmung f; (of difficulties, meaning, illogicality etc) Erkennen nt

    his quick perception of the danger saved us all from death — weil er die Gefahr blitzschnell erkannte, rettete er uns allen das Leben

    * * *
    perception [pə(r)ˈsepʃn] s
    1. (sinnliche oder geistige) Wahrnehmung, Empfindung f:
    perception of light Lichtempfindung
    2. Wahrnehmungsvermögen n
    3. Auffassung(sgabe) f
    4. Vorstellung f (of von)
    * * *
    noun
    1) (act) Wahrnehmung, die; (result) Erkenntnis, die
    2) no pl. (faculty) Wahrnehmungsvermögen, das
    3) (intuitive recognition) Gespür, das (of für); (instance) Erfassen, das
    * * *
    n.
    Auffassung f.
    Auffassungskraft f.
    Begriff -e m.
    Empfindung f.
    Erkenntnis f.
    Vorstellung f.
    Wahrnehmung f.
    Wahrnehmungsvermögen n.
    geistige Wahrnehmung f.

    English-german dictionary > perception

  • 11 perception of an object appearing larger than it is

    мед.фраз. увеличение восприятия предмета

    Англо-русский медицинский словарь > perception of an object appearing larger than it is

  • 12 perception of an object appearing smaller than it is

    мед.фраз. уменьшение восприятия предметов

    Англо-русский медицинский словарь > perception of an object appearing smaller than it is

  • 13 object and background in perception

    English-Ukrainian psychology dictionary > object and background in perception

  • 14 Complex object

    Конструкция глагол + сложное дополнение
    1) Некоторые глаголы в английском языке могут иметь при себе сложное дополнение. Сложное дополнение представляет собой оборот, состоящий из двух частей. Первая часть, подлежащее, представляет собой сущ/мест в объектной форме. Вторая часть — это инфинитив (Infinitive) либо комплемент (Complement). (Комплемент может представлять собой причастие (Participle), герундий (Ing-form), существительное в общем падеже, прилагательное или существительное с прилагательным.) Первая часть является подлежащим сложного дополнения, а вторая — его сказуемым.
    Например, в предложении I want him to come — Я хочу, чтобы он пришел глагол want имеет сложное дополнение, выраженное оборотом him to come. Подлежащим данного оборота является местоимение в объектной форме him, а сказуемым — инфинитив to come.
    В предложении He painted the house redОн покрасил дом в красный цвет глагол paint имеет при себе сложное дополнение the house red, подлежащим которого является именная группа the house, а сказуемым прилагательное red.
    а) О глаголах восприятия посредством органов чувств ( see, hear и др.), присоединяющих сложное дополнение с причастием настоящего времени и инфинитивом без частицы to см. Verbs of perception: patterns 1.
    б) О глаголах, выражающих знание, мнение, предположение, присоединяющих сложное дополнение с инфинитивами to have, to be - см. know smb to be smth / be known to be smth 1, 2.
    в) О глаголах catch, find, leave, discover и др., присоединяющих сложное дополнение с причастием настоящего времени - см. catch smb doing smth / be caught doing smth.
    г) Глаголы need, want, prefer и некоторые другие могут присоединять к себе сложное дополнение, содержащее причастие прошедшего времени - см. want smth done, Verbs of perception: patterns 2.
    д) О глаголах have и get в конструкциях со сложным дополнением - см. have smb do smth / have smb doing smth, have smth done / get smth done.
    е) В составе сложного дополнения при глаголах let и make инфинитив употребляется без частицы to - см. Bare infinitive, , .
    ж) О сложном дополнении, включающем инфинитив с частицей to - см. Verb + optional object + to-infinitive, Verb + compulsory object + to-infinitive. (Все глаголы, перечисленные в этих статьях могут присоединять сложное дополнение; исключение составляет глагол promise).
    з) О сложном дополнении, включающем герундий, см. regret his leaving / regret him leaving
    и) О глаголах, присоединяющих сложное дополнение с предикатом - именной группой см. elect smb president
    к) О глаголах, присоединяющих сложное дополнение с предикатом, выраженным прилагательным см. Consider smb foolish
    2) Многие глаголы, употребляющиеся в активном залоге в конструкции со сложным дополнением, могут также употребляться в страдательном залоге (Passive) в конструкции со сложным подлежащим (см. Complex subject)

    — Сложное подлежащее см. Complex subject

    English-Russian grammar dictionary > Complex object

  • 15 Verbs of perception: patterns

    Глаголы восприятия в конструкции со сложным дополнением/подлежащим
    1)
    а) Глаголы восприятия посредством органов чувств, а именно, глаголы see, hear, feel, listen to, look at, notice, observe, overhear, perceive, smell, spot, watch могут иметь при себе сложное дополнение (Complex object). Сложное дополнение представляет собой оборот, подлежащее которого представляет собой сущ/мест в объектной форме, а сказуемое — инфинитив без частицы to или причастие настоящего времени (Present participle).

    I saw him run — Я видел, как он пробежал.

    I saw him running — Я видел, как он бежал (Я видел его бегущим).

    б) Если некоторое законченное действие воспринималось с начала и до конца, то обычно употребляется конструкция с инфинитивом без частицы to.

    I saw him cross the street — Я видел, как он перешел улицу.

    We watched him draw the portrait — Мы наблюдали, как он нарисовал портрет.

    в) Если важно, что некоторое действие, необязательно законченное, воспринимается (воспринималось) в его развитии, то употребляется конструкция с Present participle.

    I saw him crossing the street — Я видел, как он переходил улицу.

    I see him crossing the street every day — Каждый день я вижу, как он переходит улицу.

    I watched him drawing the portrait — Я наблюдал за тем, как он рисовал портрет (может быть, говорящий наблюдал за процессом от начала и до конца, а, может быть, лишь за некоторой частью этого процесса).

    г) Сложное дополнение при глаголе восприятия может содержать причастие настоящего времени страдательного залога ( being done).

    I saw him being taken away by the policeman — Я видел, как его уводил полицейский.

    2) Глаголы hear, feel, see, watch могут иметь при себе сложное дополнение, содержащее причастие прошедшего времени (Past participle)

    I heard his name mentioned several times — Я слышал, как его имя несколько раз упоминали.

    I saw the door opened — Я видел, как открыли дверь.

    I felt myself seized round the neck from behind — Я почувствовал, как кто-то сзади схватил меня за шею

    3) Глаголы hear, observe, percieve, see в страдательном залоге (Passive) могут иметь при себе сложное подлежащее (Complex subject). После глагола может идти инфинитив с частицей to (если важен сам факт совершения действия) или причастие настоящего времени (если действие воспринималось в его развитии).

    A large cucumber was seen to shoot up in the air — Видели, как большой огурец взлетел в воздух.

    A large cucumber was seen shooting up in the air — Видели, как большой огурец взлетал в воздух.

    English-Russian grammar dictionary > Verbs of perception: patterns

  • 16 macropsia

    perception of an object appearing larger than it is, macropsia
    увеличение восприятия предмета, макропсия

    English-Russian dictionary of medicine > macropsia

  • 17 micropsia

    perception of an object appearing smaller than it is, micropsia
    уменьшение восприятия предметов, микроскопия

    English-Russian dictionary of medicine > micropsia

  • 18 impression

    [ɪm'preʃn]
    1) (idea) impressione f.
    2) (impact) impressione f., effetto m.

    to make a good impression on fare una buona impressione su; to make (quite) an impression fare impressione o effetto; it left a deep impression on him — l'ha profondamente impressionato

    3) (perception) impressione f.

    to give o create an impression of sth. dare l'impressione di qcs.; an artist's impression of the building — la visione dell'edificio da parte di un artista

    4) (imitation) imitazione f., caricatura f.
    5) (imprint) (of hand, hoof) impronta f.; (from teeth) segno m., impronta f.
    * * *
    [-ʃən]
    1) (the idea or effect produced in someone's mind by a person, experience etc: The film made a great impression on me.) impressione
    2) (a vague idea: I have the impression that he's not pleased.) impressione
    3) (the mark left by an object on another object: The dog left an impression of its paws in the wet cement.) impronta
    4) (a single printing of a book etc.) tiratura
    * * *
    [ɪm'preʃn]
    1) (idea) impressione f.
    2) (impact) impressione f., effetto m.

    to make a good impression on fare una buona impressione su; to make (quite) an impression fare impressione o effetto; it left a deep impression on him — l'ha profondamente impressionato

    3) (perception) impressione f.

    to give o create an impression of sth. dare l'impressione di qcs.; an artist's impression of the building — la visione dell'edificio da parte di un artista

    4) (imitation) imitazione f., caricatura f.
    5) (imprint) (of hand, hoof) impronta f.; (from teeth) segno m., impronta f.

    English-Italian dictionary > impression

  • 19 Mind

       It becomes, therefore, no inconsiderable part of science... to know the different operations of the mind, to separate them from each other, to class them under their proper heads, and to correct all that seeming disorder in which they lie involved when made the object of reflection and inquiry.... It cannot be doubted that the mind is endowed with several powers and faculties, that these powers are distinct from one another, and that what is really distinct to the immediate perception may be distinguished by reflection and, consequently, that there is a truth and falsehood which lie not beyond the compass of human understanding. (Hume, 1955, p. 22)
       Let us then suppose the mind to be, as we say, white Paper, void of all Characters, without any Ideas: How comes it to be furnished? Whence comes it by that vast store, which the busy and boundless Fancy of Man has painted on it, with an almost endless variety? Whence has it all the materials of Reason and Knowledge? To this I answer, in one word, from Experience. (Locke, quoted in Herrnstein & Boring, 1965, p. 584)
       The kind of logic in mythical thought is as rigorous as that of modern science, and... the difference lies, not in the quality of the intellectual process, but in the nature of things to which it is applied.... Man has always been thinking equally well; the improvement lies, not in an alleged progress of man's mind, but in the discovery of new areas to which it may apply its unchanged and unchanging powers. (Leґvi-Strauss, 1963, p. 230)
       MIND. A mysterious form of matter secreted by the brain. Its chief activity consists in the endeavor to ascertain its own nature, the futility of the attempt being due to the fact that it has nothing but itself to know itself with. (Bierce, quoted in Minsky, 1986, p. 55)
       [Philosophy] understands the foundations of knowledge and it finds these foundations in a study of man-as-knower, of the "mental processes" or the "activity of representation" which make knowledge possible. To know is to represent accurately what is outside the mind, so to understand the possibility and nature of knowledge is to understand the way in which the mind is able to construct such representation.... We owe the notion of a "theory of knowledge" based on an understanding of "mental processes" to the seventeenth century, and especially to Locke. We owe the notion of "the mind" as a separate entity in which "processes" occur to the same period, and especially to Descartes. We owe the notion of philosophy as a tribunal of pure reason, upholding or denying the claims of the rest of culture, to the eighteenth century and especially to Kant, but this Kantian notion presupposed general assent to Lockean notions of mental processes and Cartesian notions of mental substance. (Rorty, 1979, pp. 3-4)
       Under pressure from the computer, the question of mind in relation to machine is becoming a central cultural preoccupation. It is becoming for us what sex was to Victorians-threat, obsession, taboo, and fascination. (Turkle, 1984, p. 313)
       7) Understanding the Mind Remains as Resistant to Neurological as to Cognitive Analyses
       Recent years have been exciting for researchers in the brain and cognitive sciences. Both fields have flourished, each spurred on by methodological and conceptual developments, and although understanding the mechanisms of mind is an objective shared by many workers in these areas, their theories and approaches to the problem are vastly different....
       Early experimental psychologists, such as Wundt and James, were as interested in and knowledgeable about the anatomy and physiology of the nervous system as about the young science of the mind. However, the experimental study of mental processes was short-lived, being eclipsed by the rise of behaviorism early in this century. It was not until the late 1950s that the signs of a new mentalism first appeared in scattered writings of linguists, philosophers, computer enthusiasts, and psychologists.
       In this new incarnation, the science of mind had a specific mission: to challenge and replace behaviorism. In the meantime, brain science had in many ways become allied with a behaviorist approach.... While behaviorism sought to reduce the mind to statements about bodily action, brain science seeks to explain the mind in terms of physiochemical events occurring in the nervous system. These approaches contrast with contemporary cognitive science, which tries to understand the mind as it is, without any reduction, a view sometimes described as functionalism.
       The cognitive revolution is now in place. Cognition is the subject of contemporary psychology. This was achieved with little or no talk of neurons, action potentials, and neurotransmitters. Similarly, neuroscience has risen to an esteemed position among the biological sciences without much talk of cognitive processes. Do the fields need each other?... [Y]es because the problem of understanding the mind, unlike the wouldbe problem solvers, respects no disciplinary boundaries. It remains as resistant to neurological as to cognitive analyses. (LeDoux & Hirst, 1986, pp. 1-2)
       Since the Second World War scientists from different disciplines have turned to the study of the human mind. Computer scientists have tried to emulate its capacity for visual perception. Linguists have struggled with the puzzle of how children acquire language. Ethologists have sought the innate roots of social behaviour. Neurophysiologists have begun to relate the function of nerve cells to complex perceptual and motor processes. Neurologists and neuropsychologists have used the pattern of competence and incompetence of their brain-damaged patients to elucidate the normal workings of the brain. Anthropologists have examined the conceptual structure of cultural practices to advance hypotheses about the basic principles of the mind. These days one meets engineers who work on speech perception, biologists who investigate the mental representation of spatial relations, and physicists who want to understand consciousness. And, of course, psychologists continue to study perception, memory, thought and action.
    ... [W]orkers in many disciplines have converged on a number of central problems and explanatory ideas. They have realized that no single approach is likely to unravel the workings of the mind: it will not give up its secrets to psychology alone; nor is any other isolated discipline-artificial intelligence, linguistics, anthropology, neurophysiology, philosophy-going to have any greater success. (Johnson-Laird, 1988, p. 7)

    Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Mind

  • 20 Psychology

       We come therefore now to that knowledge whereunto the ancient oracle directeth us, which is the knowledge of ourselves; which deserveth the more accurate handling, by how much it toucheth us more nearly. This knowledge, as it is the end and term of natural philosophy in the intention of man, so notwithstanding it is but a portion of natural philosophy in the continent of nature.... [W]e proceed to human philosophy or Humanity, which hath two parts: the one considereth man segregate, or distributively; the other congregate, or in society. So as Human philosophy is either Simple and Particular, or Conjugate and Civil. Humanity Particular consisteth of the same parts whereof man consisteth; that is, of knowledges which respect the Body, and of knowledges that respect the Mind... how the one discloseth the other and how the one worketh upon the other... [:] the one is honored with the inquiry of Aristotle, and the other of Hippocrates. (Bacon, 1878, pp. 236-237)
       The claims of Psychology to rank as a distinct science are... not smaller but greater than those of any other science. If its phenomena are contemplated objectively, merely as nervo-muscular adjustments by which the higher organisms from moment to moment adapt their actions to environing co-existences and sequences, its degree of specialty, even then, entitles it to a separate place. The moment the element of feeling, or consciousness, is used to interpret nervo-muscular adjustments as thus exhibited in the living beings around, objective Psychology acquires an additional, and quite exceptional, distinction. (Spencer, 1896, p. 141)
       Kant once declared that psychology was incapable of ever raising itself to the rank of an exact natural science. The reasons that he gives... have often been repeated in later times. In the first place, Kant says, psychology cannot become an exact science because mathematics is inapplicable to the phenomena of the internal sense; the pure internal perception, in which mental phenomena must be constructed,-time,-has but one dimension. In the second place, however, it cannot even become an experimental science, because in it the manifold of internal observation cannot be arbitrarily varied,-still less, another thinking subject be submitted to one's experiments, comformably to the end in view; moreover, the very fact of observation means alteration of the observed object. (Wundt, 1904, p. 6)
       It is [Gustav] Fechner's service to have found and followed the true way; to have shown us how a "mathematical psychology" may, within certain limits, be realized in practice.... He was the first to show how Herbart's idea of an "exact psychology" might be turned to practical account. (Wundt, 1904, pp. 6-7)
       "Mind," "intellect," "reason," "understanding," etc. are concepts... that existed before the advent of any scientific psychology. The fact that the naive consciousness always and everywhere points to internal experience as a special source of knowledge, may, therefore, be accepted for the moment as sufficient testimony to the rights of psychology as science.... "Mind," will accordingly be the subject, to which we attribute all the separate facts of internal observation as predicates. The subject itself is determined p. 17) wholly and exclusively by its predicates. (Wundt, 1904,
       The study of animal psychology may be approached from two different points of view. We may set out from the notion of a kind of comparative physiology of mind, a universal history of the development of mental life in the organic world. Or we may make human psychology the principal object of investigation. Then, the expressions of mental life in animals will be taken into account only so far as they throw light upon the evolution of consciousness in man.... Human psychology... may confine itself altogether to man, and generally has done so to far too great an extent. There are plenty of psychological text-books from which you would hardly gather that there was any other conscious life than the human. (Wundt, 1907, pp. 340-341)
       The Behaviorist began his own formulation of the problem of psychology by sweeping aside all medieval conceptions. He dropped from his scientific vocabulary all subjective terms such as sensation, perception, image, desire, purpose, and even thinking and emotion as they were subjectively defined. (Watson, 1930, pp. 5-6)
       According to the medieval classification of the sciences, psychology is merely a chapter of special physics, although the most important chapter; for man is a microcosm; he is the central figure of the universe. (deWulf, 1956, p. 125)
       At the beginning of this century the prevailing thesis in psychology was Associationism.... Behavior proceeded by the stream of associations: each association produced its successors, and acquired new attachments with the sensations arriving from the environment.
       In the first decade of the century a reaction developed to this doctrine through the work of the Wurzburg school. Rejecting the notion of a completely self-determining stream of associations, it introduced the task ( Aufgabe) as a necessary factor in describing the process of thinking. The task gave direction to thought. A noteworthy innovation of the Wurzburg school was the use of systematic introspection to shed light on the thinking process and the contents of consciousness. The result was a blend of mechanics and phenomenalism, which gave rise in turn to two divergent antitheses, Behaviorism and the Gestalt movement. The behavioristic reaction insisted that introspection was a highly unstable, subjective procedure.... Behaviorism reformulated the task of psychology as one of explaining the response of organisms as a function of the stimuli impinging upon them and measuring both objectively. However, Behaviorism accepted, and indeed reinforced, the mechanistic assumption that the connections between stimulus and response were formed and maintained as simple, determinate functions of the environment.
       The Gestalt reaction took an opposite turn. It rejected the mechanistic nature of the associationist doctrine but maintained the value of phenomenal observation. In many ways it continued the Wurzburg school's insistence that thinking was more than association-thinking has direction given to it by the task or by the set of the subject. Gestalt psychology elaborated this doctrine in genuinely new ways in terms of holistic principles of organization.
       Today psychology lives in a state of relatively stable tension between the poles of Behaviorism and Gestalt psychology.... (Newell & Simon, 1963, pp. 279-280)
       As I examine the fate of our oppositions, looking at those already in existence as guide to how they fare and shape the course of science, it seems to me that clarity is never achieved. Matters simply become muddier and muddier as we go down through time. Thus, far from providing the rungs of a ladder by which psychology gradually climbs to clarity, this form of conceptual structure leads rather to an ever increasing pile of issues, which we weary of or become diverted from, but never really settle. (Newell, 1973b, pp. 288-289)
       The subject matter of psychology is as old as reflection. Its broad practical aims are as dated as human societies. Human beings, in any period, have not been indifferent to the validity of their knowledge, unconcerned with the causes of their behavior or that of their prey and predators. Our distant ancestors, no less than we, wrestled with the problems of social organization, child rearing, competition, authority, individual differences, personal safety. Solving these problems required insights-no matter how untutored-into the psychological dimensions of life. Thus, if we are to follow the convention of treating psychology as a young discipline, we must have in mind something other than its subject matter. We must mean that it is young in the sense that physics was young at the time of Archimedes or in the sense that geometry was "founded" by Euclid and "fathered" by Thales. Sailing vessels were launched long before Archimedes discovered the laws of bouyancy [ sic], and pillars of identical circumference were constructed before anyone knew that C IID. We do not consider the ship builders and stone cutters of antiquity physicists and geometers. Nor were the ancient cave dwellers psychologists merely because they rewarded the good conduct of their children. The archives of folk wisdom contain a remarkable collection of achievements, but craft-no matter how perfected-is not science, nor is a litany of successful accidents a discipline. If psychology is young, it is young as a scientific discipline but it is far from clear that psychology has attained this status. (Robinson, 1986, p. 12)

    Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Psychology

См. также в других словарях:

  • Perception — For other uses, see Perception (disambiguation). Perceptual redirects here. For the Brian Blade album, see Perceptual (album). Robert Fludd s depiction of perception (1619) …   Wikipedia

  • Object (philosophy) — Philosophy ( …   Wikipedia

  • Object-oriented ontology — (OOO) is a metaphysical movement that rejects the privileging of human existence over the existence of nonhuman objects.[1] Specifically, object oriented ontology opposes the anthropocentrism of Immanuel Kant s Copernican Revolution, whereby… …   Wikipedia

  • Object Action Complex — Object Action Complexes (OACs) are proposed as a universal representation enabling efficient planning and execution of purposeful action at all levels of a cognitive architecture (Kruger 2009, Worgotter 2008, Geib 2006, Piater 2009). OACs combine …   Wikipedia

  • perception — perceptional, adj. /peuhr sep sheuhn/, n. 1. the act or faculty of apprehending by means of the senses or of the mind; cognition; understanding. 2. immediate or intuitive recognition or appreciation, as of moral, psychological, or aesthetic… …   Universalium

  • Cognitive neuroscience of visual object recognition — Object recognition is the ability to perceive an object’s physical properties (such as shape, colour and texture) and apply semantic attributes to the object, which includes the understanding of its use, previous experience with the object and… …   Wikipedia

  • Object permanence — Psychology …   Wikipedia

  • perception — The mental process of becoming aware of or recognizing an object or idea; primarily cognitive rather than affective or conative, although all three aspects are manifested. SYN: esthesia (1). depth p. the visual ability to judge …   Medical dictionary

  • perception and attention deficit model — (PAD Model)    A hypothetical model for the mediation of * complex visual hallucinations, proposed in or shortly before 2004 by the British scientists Daniel Collerton, Elaine Perry, and Ian McK eith. The PAD model is based on the observation… …   Dictionary of Hallucinations

  • perception — Synonyms and related words: acuity, acumen, acuteness, apperception, appreciation, appreciativeness, apprehension, astuteness, awareness, clear sight, cogency, cognition, cognizance, color vision, comprehension, conceit, concept, conception, cone …   Moby Thesaurus

  • object recognition — noun the visual perception of familiar objects • Hypernyms: ↑visual perception, ↑beholding, ↑seeing …   Useful english dictionary

Поделиться ссылкой на выделенное

Прямая ссылка:
Нажмите правой клавишей мыши и выберите «Копировать ссылку»